An organizational assessment of 101 Community-Based Adult Services centers to identify and address gaps in influenza vaccination among Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries.

INTRODUCTION: Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries are at high risk of experiencing severe disease from influenza. Yet, immunization assessment followed by influenza vaccination (when needed) are not regularly performed at Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS) centers in/near medically underserved areas. To better understand this challenge, an organizational assessment was conducted in early 2020 to identify and examine modifiable factors that may impede or facilitate immunization assessment and influenza vaccination at CBAS centers in Los Angeles County (LAC), California. METHODS: All 158 CBAS centers in LAC were asked to complete a 17-question survey. The survey asked about immunization assessment, gaps in communication with primary care providers, knowledge and use of the California Immunization Registry (CAIR), and institutional policies for influenza vaccination. In addition, the survey asked each center about its vaccination policy for staff and clients, including whether or not increasing vaccinations was an interest/priority for the center. Best subsets algorithms (regression models) were performed to identify factors that may influence CBAS centers' practices on immunization assessment and vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 158 centers, 101 (66 %) completed the survey. A majority did not conduct immunization assessments for influenza (n = 59; 58 %); nearly-two-thirds (n = 70; 71 %) reported it would be feasible to do so if the practice is integrated as part of the individualized/nursing plan of care. Best subsets algorithms showed the strongest factors influencing whether CBAS centers assess for influenza vaccination were: center size, staff training on CAIR, presence of barriers to vaccination, and the belief that it is the center's responsibility to conduct immunization assessments and vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that practice gaps in immunization assessment and influenza vaccination are common at LAC's CBAS centers. Closing these gaps may help LAC (and California) improve influenza vaccine uptake and other vaccinations (e.g., pneumococcal, COVID-19) among the most vulnerable of the state's aging populations, Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries.

Self-criticism, self-compassion, and perceived health: moderating effect of ethnicity.

A caring and compassionate attitude toward the self (i.e., self-compassion) has been linked to various mental and physical health benefits. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is widely used in psychology literature in order to assess global self-compassion. However, recent evidence suggests that the single factor model comprising positive and negative items of the SCS in fact measures two distinct constructs (i.e., self-criticism/self-coldness and self-compassion) with different psychological correlates. Given these recent findings, in addition to other research that highlights cultural differences in self-conceptualizations and self-evaluations, the present study examined potential ethnic differences in the relationships between self-criticism, self-compassion, and perceived health. Participants included 728 college students (141 Asian American, 449 European American, and 138 Hispanic/Latinx individuals) attending a university in the northeast United States. Results indicated that the relationship between self-criticism and self-compassion was significantly different across ethnicity. In addition, the relationships between these two constructs (i.e., self-criticism and self-compassion) and perceived health were moderated by ethnicity. Our findings suggest that focusing on global self-compassion scores (i.e., total SCS scores) may miss some of the important cultural or ethnic differences in the relationships between self-criticism, self-compassion, and perceived health.

Logistical and structural challenges are the major obstacles for family medicine physicians' ability to administer adult vaccines.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to characterize the vaccination practices and challenges of family medicine physicians in Los Angeles County, California. METHODS: The Los Angeles Academy of Family Physicians (LA AFP) sent out electronic surveys to all of their active members (N = 1121) between December 2017 and January 2018, and asked them to answer questions about themselves, their practice, their patient population, and their immunization practices and challenges. We then analyzed the results through basic statistical calculations and Pearson's chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Seventy-four people (6.6%) responded to the survey, and 75% of responders stated that they administer all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended vaccines. The lowest vaccine administration rates were for the high-dose influenza vaccine, which 66.2% (n = 49) of respondents reported to administer, followed by the meningococcal B vaccine (68.9%; n = 51). The respondents who belonged to practices with more than 11 providers, were part of a large hospital or healthcare system, had electronic medical records (EMRs), and used the California Immunization Registry (CAIR) were more likely to report to vaccinate. The number one responding physician-reported challenge to vaccination was limited time and resources to address patient resistance followed by vaccine cost and lack of infrastructure to store vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, structural and logistical challenges appeared to make the biggest impact on adult vaccination for the responding family medicine physicians. Solutions addressing these challenges will help improve the adult immunization rates.

Proposal to Reduce Adult Immunization Barriers in California.

Adult vaccination rates in the United States are consistently lower than the National Healthy People 2020 goals. Barriers to adult vaccination include inconsistency of insurance coverage of adult vaccines and difficulty in accessing vaccines. To help address the gap in adult access to vaccines, in 2016 the Department of Health Care Services--which administers the Medi-Cal program (California's version of Medicaid)--implemented the All Plan Letter (APL) 16-009, which requires coverage of recommended adult vaccines as a pharmacy benefit. Adult Medi-Cal patients can now receive the vaccines recommended for their age and underlying health conditions, and they can do so not only at a provider's office but also at local pharmacies, improving access and convenience. This policy brief recommends expanding coverage of all adult vaccines as a pharmacy benefit of all public and commercial insurance plans.

Early lessons learned from extramural school programs that offer HPV vaccine.

BACKGROUND: There has been little evaluation of school-located vaccination programs that offer human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in US schools without health centers (ie, extramural programs). This article summarizes lessons learned from such programs. METHODS: In July to August 2010, 5 programs were identified. Semistructured, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with program representatives about practical aspects of planning and implementation, including configuration and effectiveness. RESULTS: Most programs offered HPV vaccine as part of a broader effort to increase uptake of adolescent vaccines. Respondents stressed the importance of building partnerships with local school systems throughout all aspects of the planning and implementation phases. All programs offered HPV vaccine at no cost to students. Most did not have a mechanism to bill private insurance, and some found Medicaid reimbursements to be a challenge. Programs achieved modest rates of initiation of the 3-dose HPV vaccine series (median 10%); however, among those who initiated the series, completion rates were high (median 78%). HPV vaccine uptake was lowest for a program that offered only HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Extramural programs may increase uptake of vaccines and decrease absenteeism due to noncompliance with vaccine requirements for school entry. Until extramural programs in the US receive better access to billing private insurers and Medicaid, sustainability of these programs relies on grant funding. Better integration of extramural school-located vaccine programs with existing local healthcare and other programs at schools is an area for growth.

Cuestionario para evaluar salud mental en la edad juvenil / Questionnaire for the evaluation of mental health in adolescence

En el presente trabajo se informan los procedimientos empleados en la construcción de un cuestionario para evaluar Salud Mental en la Edad Juvenil. El instrumento se encamina a discriminar entre jóvenes normales y otros con psicopatología a través de una estimación de probabilidad estadística en grupos, sin que entregue un diagnóstico individual. La confiabilidad y validez encontrada permiten señalar que es un cuestionario que puede ser utilizado en estudios poblacionales. Los datos del análisis factorial realizado, que tuvo un carácter confirmatorio y no exploratorio, muestran que el instrumento tiene una estructura que permite explicar en buena medida la respuesta de los individuos frente al test

Cuestionario para evaluar salud mental en la edad juvenil / Questionnaire for the evaluation of mental health in adolescence

En el presente trabajo se informan los procedimientos empleados en la construcción de un cuestionario para evaluar Salud Mental en la Edad Juvenil. El instrumento se encamina a discriminar entre jóvenes normales y otros con psicopatología a través de una estimación de probabilidad estadística en grupos, sin que entregue un diagnóstico individual. La confiabilidad y validez encontrada permiten señalar que es un cuestionario que puede ser utilizado en estudios poblacionales. Los datos del análisis factorial realizado, que tuvo un carácter confirmatorio y no exploratorio, muestran que el instrumento tiene una estructura que permite explicar en buena medida la respuesta de los individuos frente al test (AU)